Google
Web seanonpolynapping.blogspot.com

Wednesday, November 30, 2005

Photoperiods and sleep

I was poking around PubMed today, doing research on melatonin and its effects on sleep, and came across this abstract. It says that humans will naturally adapt to a biphasic sleeping cycle if the photoperiod (read, daylight time) is decreased to 10 hours (as opposed to 16).

The sleep periods are broken into evenly spaced segments, spaced apart by a few hours.

It made me think that maybe, with manipulation of lighting and light spacing, one could induce a more-segmented polyphasic sleep schedule. Though, I doubt one would be able to induce Uberman sleep from light cues. According to Wikipedia (under Circadian Rhythm), the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), which regulates the circadian cycle in humans, doesn’t react quickly to light changes, so it would probably be difficult to induce 20 minute bursts of sleeping.

It’s a thought, though… (I'm slipping into speculation mode, now) for those that are having trouble initially during those nighttime naps, it could be because the SCN is targeting your body for sleep. Using bright lights (say, a few thousand lux) constantly during this period could convince the SCN that it’s not night time. This might make those naps a little easier to wake up from, since your body would not be preparing for normal sleep.

Of course, generating that amount of lux might be a bit tricky… perhaps just normal lighting shone close on one’s body (like a desk lamp pointed at one’s face) would work. I’ll have to check the math to see what would be needed.

-sean

2 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

I love people who do their homework! Most of polyphasic sleepers just try to slog it out through pain. You keep searching and learning. If you have already arrived at the SCN, you certainly smell the problem of 24:16 periodicity. If you now study phase response curves, you will be a step away from discovering why polyphasic sleep will never work (unless you are narcoleptic, naturally, which you are obviously not).

be back

12/02/2005 03:38:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

ah yes. I am not sure you draw the right conclusions from the JSR abstract. The biphasic pattern is likely a result of super-position of two major oscillators. In simple terms, that what is a postprandial dip for some, or siesta for others, in Wehr's paper becomes a second nearly-symmetrical sleep block (many people sleep like that on a permanent basis and do great - I knew one personally - although he was a bit over 250 pounds :). This does not mean that you can go a step further and make it "triphasic" or polyphasic. Biphasic is:
1. generally unstable (night sleep with grow, nap-time will shorten)
2. induced as in the paper will actually take MORE time of your day (exactly the opposite of your goals)

sleep healthy

12/02/2005 03:45:00 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home